Author: Victoria Chan
Date: 14-01-03 07:04
Thanks for your wonderful input. There are many services runing on this box. They include apache, mysql, ssh, qmail, sftp, & ipf. I am bringing up FreeBSD # 3 to do just IPNAT/IPF for now, but I really would prefer to have one FreeBSD do everything.
The 2nd FreeBSD box does pretty much the same as the 1st box, but it does not do the IPNAT. I was hoping to do the same Dual WAN for FreeBSD box # 2 as well.
Currently, I have rc.conf set up a static route to my token_ring segment that my novell server (internal) does the routing:
static_routes="tokenring"
route_tokenring="192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.5"
What do you think of my adding something like this, whereby WAN-A is public access, and WAN-B is redundancy & NAT, and ditching the "defaultrouter" statement:
static_routes="wan-a"
route_wan-a="0.0.0.0/32 64.114.80.1"
static_routes="wan-b"
route_wan-b="0.0.0.0/32 24.77.228.1"
|
|
